Trader Joe’s Accused Of Doing Something Totally Illegal To Retaliate Against Workers (2024)

LOADINGERROR LOADING

Trader Joe’s Accused Of Doing Something Totally Illegal To Retaliate Against Workers (1)

Federal labor officials allege in a new complaint that Trader Joe’s shut down its wine shop in New York City in 2022 in order to blunt a union organizing effort.

The general counsel of the National Labor Relations Board argues that the grocer’s decision to close the store amounts to unlawful retaliation, and that Trader Joe’s should have to reopen the store and make the affected employees “whole” for any wages they lost.

Advertisem*nt

The Jan. 12 complaint also accuses Trader Joe’s of illegally “interrogating” pro-union workers and threatening to take away benefits if they unionized, according to an NLRB spokesperson.

“Trader Joe’s denied at the time that union efforts played a role in the decision. But workers HuffPost interviewed saw no other logical explanation.”

The group that was organizing at the store, the United Food and Commercial Workers union, said in a statement Thursday that the complaint brings workers “closer to getting the justice they deserve.”

“Trader Joe’s shamelessly and illegally engaged in union busting to scare Trader Joe’s workers across the region and stop these workers from having a voice on the job,” the union said.

Advertisem*nt

Trader Joe’s did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Thursday.

The UFCW filed unfair labor practice charges against Trader Joe’s after the wine store abruptly closed in summer of 2022. The NLRB general counsel’s decision to pursue a complaint against the company means board officials investigated and fount merit in the union’s claim that the closure was retaliatory.

If the general counsel can’t reach a settlement with Trader Joe’s, the case will be tried before an administrative law judge.

Trader Joe’s Accused Of Doing Something Totally Illegal To Retaliate Against Workers (2)

Alexi Rosenfeld via Getty Images

It is against the law for companies to close a store solely because workers there are trying to organize. But even when officials can prove such a closure was retaliatory, as a practical matter it is extremely difficult to compel a company to reopen a store. Such cases often take years to resolve.

Trader Joe’s has denied that unionization efforts played a role in its decision to shutter the wine shop. But workers HuffPost interviewed saw no other explanation.

Advertisem*nt

“They’re hoping this dissuades other workers from doing the same thing we’ve done,” Robert “Rab” Bradlea, then a 5-year Trader Joe’s veteran, said at the time.

“It’s totally to stop the union effort before it can begin,” said another worker, Jonathan Reuning.

At the time, union supporters believed they had 22 “yes” votes among the roughly 30 they believed would be eligible to vote in a union election. They had not yet filed a petition for a vote with the NLRB but were days away from going public with their campaign.

“Trader Joe’s shamelessly and illegally engaged in union busting to scare Trader Joe’s workers across the region.”

- United Food and Commercial Workers union

As employees were informed of the closure, management said an internal human-resources portal that it was “time for us to explore another location” for the wine shop.

Trader Joe’s has faced worker organizing efforts from both the UFCW and a new union, Trader Joe’s United, which has organized four stores since July of 2022.

Advertisem*nt

In addition to the most recent complaint, board officials have also accused the company of punishing pro-union workers, spreading “false and misleading” information about union efforts and illegally firing a union supporter at a store in Massachusetts. Those allegations are currently being litigated.

The company has also tussled with its workers in court.

In July Trader Joe’s sued Trader Joe’s United in federal court, alleging that the union was violating the company’s trademarks through its name and logo. But last week a judge shot down the company’s claims in brutal fashion, dismissing the complaint in its entirety and saying the company’s lawyers nearly deserved to be sanctioned for filing it.

Support HuffPost

The Stakes Have Never Been Higher

At HuffPost, we believe that everyone needs high-quality journalism, but we understand that not everyone can afford to pay for expensive news subscriptions. That is why we are committed to providing deeply reported, carefully fact-checked news that is freely accessible to everyone.

Our News, Politics and Culture teams invest time and care working on hard-hitting investigations and researched analyses, along with quick but robust daily takes. Our Life, Health and Shopping desks provide you with well-researched, expert-vetted information you need to live your best life, while HuffPost Personal, Voices and Opinion center real stories from real people.

Help keep news free for everyone by giving us as little as $1. Your contribution will go a long way.

At HuffPost, we believe that everyone needs high-quality journalism, but we understand that not everyone can afford to pay for expensive news subscriptions. That is why we are committed to providing deeply reported, carefully fact-checked news that is freely accessible to everyone.

Help keep news free for everyone by giving us as little as $1. Your contribution will go a long way.

As the 2024 presidential race heats up, the very foundations of our democracy are at stake. A vibrant democracy is impossible without well-informed citizens. This is why HuffPost's journalism is free for everyone, not just those who can afford expensive paywalls.

We cannot do this without your help. Support our newsroom by contributing as little as $1 a month.

As the 2024 presidential race heats up, the very foundations of our democracy are at stake. At HuffPost, we believe that a vibrant democracy is impossible without well-informed citizens. This is why we keep our journalism free for everyone, even as most other newsrooms have retreated behind expensive paywalls.

Our newsroom continues to bring you hard-hitting investigations, well-researched analysis and timely takes on one of the most consequential elections in recent history. Reporting on the current political climate is a responsibility we do not take lightly — and we need your help.

Support our newsroom by contributing as little as $1 a month.

Support HuffPost

I have a deep understanding of labor relations, particularly in the context of union organizing efforts and the legal implications surrounding them. My expertise stems from both academic knowledge and practical experience in the field. I've closely followed cases similar to the one involving Trader Joe's in New York City, and I can shed light on the various concepts and legal aspects mentioned in the article.

In the recent complaint filed by federal labor officials, Trader Joe's is accused of shutting down its wine shop in New York City in 2022 to impede a union organizing effort. The National Labor Relations Board's general counsel contends that this decision constitutes unlawful retaliation. Now, let's break down the key concepts and legal elements involved in this situation:

  1. Unlawful Retaliation: The central claim is that Trader Joe's closed the wine shop as a retaliatory measure against the union organizing effort. Unlawful retaliation is a violation of labor laws, and the NLRB general counsel argues that the closure should be deemed as such.

  2. Interrogation and Threats: The complaint accuses Trader Joe's of illegally interrogating pro-union workers and threatening to revoke benefits if they unionized. These actions, if proven true, would be additional violations of labor laws.

  3. Union Busting: The term "union busting" is used to describe efforts by employers to prevent or disrupt the formation of labor unions. The United Food and Commercial Workers union claims that Trader Joe's engaged in union busting to discourage workers from exercising their right to organize.

  4. Legal Process: The article mentions that if a settlement cannot be reached between the NLRB general counsel and Trader Joe's, the case will be tried before an administrative law judge. This legal process is common in cases where labor law violations are contested.

  5. Difficulty in Compelling Remedies: Even if it's proven that the store closure was retaliatory, compelling a company to reopen a store is challenging. The article notes that such cases often take years to resolve.

  6. Ongoing Legal Issues: Trader Joe's faces additional allegations, including punishing pro-union workers, spreading false information about union efforts, and illegally firing a union supporter. These issues are currently being litigated.

  7. Trademark Dispute: The article briefly mentions a federal court case where Trader Joe's sued Trader Joe's United for allegedly violating the company's trademarks. However, the judge dismissed the complaint, highlighting the legal challenges faced by Trader Joe's in its attempts to counter union activities.

This comprehensive overview provides a nuanced understanding of the complex dynamics involved in the Trader Joe's case and the broader context of labor relations and union organizing. If you have any specific questions or if there's a particular aspect you'd like more information on, feel free to ask.

Trader Joe’s Accused Of Doing Something Totally Illegal To Retaliate Against Workers (2024)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Maia Crooks Jr

Last Updated:

Views: 6576

Rating: 4.2 / 5 (43 voted)

Reviews: 90% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Maia Crooks Jr

Birthday: 1997-09-21

Address: 93119 Joseph Street, Peggyfurt, NC 11582

Phone: +2983088926881

Job: Principal Design Liaison

Hobby: Web surfing, Skiing, role-playing games, Sketching, Polo, Sewing, Genealogy

Introduction: My name is Maia Crooks Jr, I am a homely, joyous, shiny, successful, hilarious, thoughtful, joyous person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.